Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Qns: Comment on these arguments: 1.Smoking is bad for health. Those who smoke are likely to develop health problems. So bad health is caused by smoking. 2.H1N1 is now a panademic. A panademic is widespread all over the world. Many people will succumb to it and those who don't survive it will die. It'll wipe out humankind and the world will come to an end. 3. The Principal says that staying at home will contain the spread of virus. The principal is right. We should all stay home until the viral attack is over.
Ans:
For the first question, it is beating around the bush. It did not go straight to the point. This result that the audience find it no conclusion as it only have the starting and linking but no justification nor clear explanation on what they exactly want to convey to the audience.
For the second question, there is no justification on how H1N1 will kill people which will lead to the wipe out of humankind. It only give an argument statement by saying that H1N1 is panademic, and that it will wipe out humankind and the world will come to an end. It doesn’t seem to explain how.
For the third question, it has stated its point, justify it and come to a satisfying conclusion. The message that they want to convey to the audience is clear and easy to be understood.
Thanks to all the blogs i referred to (countless) for html code help :) (esp. cyn' and sixseven)
Adobe Photoshop Elements for supernatural abilities
